|
J. Brett Harvey
President & CEO
CONSOL Energy
Last month, Art Sanda took
the industry to task for promoting, “the industry’s ludicrous
cry of ‘Zero Fatalities’.” His thesis was that life is not
perfect, people make mistakes, and Acts of God will happen.
Instead of promoting the impossible, he said, we should promote
the idea that each of us must take responsibility for safety one
day at a time.
Well, a fair number of
people at CONSOL were heating up a kettle of tar and getting the
feathers after they read that, because we believe that Zero
Accidents, let alone Zero Fatalities, is achievable.
But to make sure that we
weren’t being unfair to Art, I read his piece again and I think
we are on the same page, at least on some points. First, we
agree that industry’s goal must be to “make safety a reality.”
Second, we agree that safety must be more than just a slogan.
Third, we agree that people must be individually responsible for
safety.
However, we part company
with Art on one point on which the whole discussion of safety
turns. We believe we can be at zero every day. We are closer
than he thinks. But we will never get to zero if we accept the
premise that “stuff happens.”
The U.S. coal industry has
made substantial safety progress. In 1975, we had 1,068
fatalities compared with only 22 in 2005. The coal industry has
a better overall safety record than many other sectors of the
economy and we are far ahead of countries such as China, where
the coal mine fatality rate is 13 PER DAY.
But I believe we can
eliminate accidents altogether. Last year 7,515 CONSOL Energy
employees worked the entire year accident free. That is 97
percent of our workforce. Is it really a stretch to think we
can’t get to 100 percent?
I like to think of safety
as a triad. Compliance with the law is the first element.
Failure to comply with the law is unacceptable job performance.
However, compliance alone
will not eliminate accidents. We have numerous laws regarding
speed and driving behavior on our roads, yet accidents still
occur. Laws are not enough.
Compliance with the law is
only one element in the safety triad.
The second is the
technology/safety interface.
We have an obligation to
engineer our mines to eliminate, to the extent humanly possible,
the physical conditions that cause accidents. With the
prodigious engineering capacity in the industry and in the
country, there is no reason that this element of the triad
cannot be achieved.
The third, and most
important element of the safety triad, is the human element -- a
point Art made in his editorial. At CONSOL, we refer to it as
the culture of safety.
In our culture, each
employee must make safety a core value. Working safely is a
condition of employment at CONSOL Energy and we hold every
employee responsible for it.
In our culture, we pay
attention to the signals we send everyday by the manner in which
we run the business. Does production trump safety, or does
safety trump production? Our commitment is to a culture where
safety trumps production, where it trumps profits, where it
trumps all other rules, policies or procedures. We empower every
employee to stop the operation if he believes that safety is
being compromised., and we make them accountable.
We believe in constant
analysis and observation of job procedures and processes. The
goal is to root out any action that could lead to an accident
and replace it with a better one.
We believe in having a
constant conversation about safety and we believe there is no
monopoly on good ideas when it comes to eliminating accidents.
Everyone should be engaged in the conversation.
We believe it is essential
to give employees the tools and the training they need to reach
their full potential as productive and safe contributors.
And we believe we must
submit to the discipline of constant training and evaluation
rather than just the periodic training required by law.
As part of our AT ZERO
accidents program, we ask employees to say why they are
personally committed to being AT ZERO every day. Many say, “So
I can come home to my family” or “So I will be around to teach
my son to fish”. By asking them to identify, articulate and
visualize their reason, we hope to create a deep, personal
reminder of why this is important.
In that regard, maybe Art
and I aren’t so far apart after all.
|